Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Linda Noskova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Noskova analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Linda Noskova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Noskova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.19% of points on their second serve, while Noskova has won 47.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 55.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Noskova has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.7% and 34.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 65.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Noskova has saved 58.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Noskova winning 62.96% (W/L 34/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.5 while Noskova has played against players with an average rank of 114.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Noskova has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 44.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Noskova has converted 43.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
139
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
29
Rank
28
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
64% (347-196)
Career Total W/L
67% (136-66)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
63% (17-10)
$5,050,999
Career Prize Money
$1,665,160
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Linda Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 63% (17/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/249) | 51% (315/305) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 70% (14/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 113 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:40:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.41 | 91.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1021/1716) | 61% (1218/2003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (666/1021) | 68% (834/1218) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (328/695) | 47% (370/785) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (81/181) | 44% (86/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (684/1623) | 41% (815/1999) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 70% (7/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 89% (8/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 33% (9/3) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats 
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Noskova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Harriet Dart
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Linda Noskova
42%
(
30 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Noskova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
